EGO breaker mathematics

We will add several such CONCEPTS measurement systems (even those are relative measures with reference to some standard thing or standard Concepts) Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS has taken few such standard use cases

Taking reference to Concept of "the" Which is urge for conscious deterministic definitely defined definition...this "the is most frequently used term in any article

Science Epistemic systems do these regularly

Example speed of light

Example Density of water

Similarly we can prepare standard to measure other scientific objects

Drink then derive

Sanjoy Nath drinkussions blog has several such notes where drinkussions with Indranil Bhattacharjee first drinkussed and argued in 2011 that if any idea don't change after drinking then only your cautioness and cognitive strength are not chemical dependent

Then Sanjoy Nath designed consciousness measurement chemicalness as how many bottles of 750 ml alcohol consumption keep your all concepts and ideas same exactly as Zero ml alcohol consumption

Chemicals dependency factors of your consciousness is important for consciousness tests

There are other concepts like relative consciousness (as specific gravity is measured density ratio to water reference...) here we take alcohol reference

The mathematics of

EGO BREAKING

Every concept has some measurements conditions and comparative conditions

These are

Slab 1.

QUEUEDNESS wise NECESSITY (NECESSARYNESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS Which examines the QUEUEDNESS of concepts construction in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS orders)

WHENNESS wise NECESSITY (NECESSARYNESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Whenomenology reasoning system WRS Which examines the WHENNESS of concepts consumption (when the mass adopted the concept in daily use)in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS WHENNESS orders)

______

Slab 2.

QUEUEDNESS wise SUFFICIENCE SUFFICIENTNESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS Which examines the QUEUEDNESS of concepts construction in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS orders)

WHENNESS wise SUFFICIENCE (SUFFICIENTNESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Whenomenology reasoning system WRS Which examines the WHENNESS of concepts consumption (when the mass adopted the concept in daily use)in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS WHENNESS orders)

_____________

Slab 3.

QUEUEDNESS wise POSSIBLITY (POSSIBLENESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS Which examines the QUEUEDNESS of concepts construction in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS orders)

WHENNESS wise POSSIBLITY (POSSIBLENESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Whenomenology reasoning system WRS Which examines the WHENNESS of concepts consumption (when the mass adopted the concept in daily use)in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS WHENNESS orders)

_________

Slab 3+.

QUEUEDNESS wise SATURITY (SATURATEDNESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS Which examines the QUEUEDNESS of concepts construction in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS orders)

WHENNESS wise SATURITY (SATURATEDNESS) of (that_concerned_concept) for Sanjoy Nath's Whenomenology reasoning system WRS Which examines the WHENNESS of concepts consumption (when the mass adopted the concept in daily use)in a mankind (a mankind is said assuming different planets can have human like cognitive reasonative agents who started their civilization at different conditions different times and differently with different concepts construction QUEUEDNESS WHENNESS orders)

In this way Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS and Whenomenology reasoning system WRS compares every Concepts and then finds at which state mankind is standing on

If Concepts are measured WITH these states of mankind altering Concepts we can then understand how humans compare Concepts

Otherwise

Humans compare among humanselfs

Where COMPARABLE HUMNSELF means Bunch of comparative concepts with which humans can compare among themselves

The mathematics of

EGO BREAKING

When some concepts come and destroy humans own comparative senses Where NO NEED FOR COMPARABLE HUMNSELF means Bunch of comparative concepts with which humans can stop compare among themselves

A new reasoning on sociology

New approaches to economic analysis

Upto now its a Partial theory

Need your inputs

Need your cross questions

Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS and Whenomenology Reasoning System WRS treats humans action as pure chemical action where there is no subjectivity.

Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS and Whenomenology Reasoning Systems WRS deals with dictionary closure principle as fundamental reasoning structure. All human language dictiionary contains two columns... First column has n number of words... These n number of unique words are n number of discrete unique Concepts... One to one mapping between concept and words... We assume there is no unnecessary words in dictionary and polysemy is not possible because all unique words are fit for certain contextual evaluation.. Sanjoy Nath's Concepts calculus has concepts evaluation system which evaluation structure (evaluation algorithm uniquely places every concept at unique point on real numbers line so all concept are like real numbers and concepts spaces are allmost isomorphic to real numbers spaces)

So we can use real numbers dependent algebra and calculus reasoning with Languages and sentiments of humans...

With exhaustive set of unique Concepts present in n numbers of rows in first column of dictionary are used (repeatedly or once) in second column of dictionary... This operation called description_of(r_th_concept) uses all or some or atleast one concepts from the set of all concepts in 0_th concept to (r-1)_th concepts in first column of dictionary objects... So dictionary is arranged (sorted) with such kind of dependence chain (no lexicographically ordered system used in QRS WRS Order rules) and for row= r we ensure that these column 2 descriptions are set of unique Concepts conglomerate to relate togather to describe the (unique concept in column 1 of dictionary object)... None of such encoded Concepts in column 2 are in column 1 of row> r Which means there is strictly strict queued dependency chain ensueed for every such row r ... There is exhaustive list of unique n concept in column 1 ordered as per recursively dependent chain as described above... This way we prepare Concepts dependency hierarchy and this hierarchical structure of ordering generates algebra of Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS... Strict Concept construction order... Concepts construction QUEUEDNESS order... This algebra is strong enough to catch Cognitive bias in human reasoning systems... To find the zeroth concept SanjoyNath first found frequecy distribution of all words in a combined large dictionary in english and found frequecy of concept of "the" (Which depict definiteness... this signifies human chemical structure of body and its mind has a deep natural craving and natural urge natural tendency of definiteness so definitely defined definition for everything defines humanness... humanness is also chemical structure) first is highest,then is frequency of "of" which connects two concepts... This definiteness of definition charity for every Concepts and relatedness between Concepts are fundamental characters of chemical structures activities inside humans body …Frequency is not the evaluation system but SanjoyNath is trying to understand the structure of chemical super structure working beneath the minds action to conceptualize ideate the chronology of Concepts bank and idea bank...that exposes through language of mankind

All these concepts are constructed sequentially (strict QUEUEDNESS of dependence chain of recursive dependency and closure of algebra)

We can do+-×÷=><√... Kind of arithmetic with Concepts... Our human biology chemistry is not prepared enough to hold such a large field (algebra field structure) so our humans chemical capacity can handle a very small subset of such Large field... Some culture of humans languages have different levels of concept construction capabilities due to their food habits and weather conditions... Sone other regions of language users have different kind of chemical structure in food habits and ambient nature so they have different levels of Concepts consumption rate...

Concept construction structure and concepts consumption structure governed GDP, growth, business,need, curiosity, interest and All other economic factors

We humans need concept evaluation system like decimal strings evaluation as Sanjoy Nath’s Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS is designing such framework

A very large segment of human's cognitive bias is constructed due to human's own languages... Maximum of humans Languages dont behave like numbers(naturally )... Untill we enforcing Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS on all statements of human's languages... We know the decimals encoding systems of real numbers give us local freedom to compare any two numbers without looking at other numbers strings... We know that for decimal representation of real numbers are string of symbols which encoded evaluation systems, naturally orderliness systems, natural queuedness systems to order evaluation chains...this gives freedom to compare any two real numbers without looking at other numbers objects... We dont need to bother on contextual setting to compare Which of two such decimal strings are to place leftwards on real numbers line and which one to place at rightward on real numbers line... Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS is trying to design such Concepts encoding system to evaluate the concept ordering evaluation such that we can get freedom from other concepts involvement while comparing QUEUEDNESS of concepts construction ordering... This systems Will help us get more free from cognitive biases...

QRS WRS analysis is linguistics statistical analysis on all sociology and economic understanding, prediction, forecasting...

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

Otherwise there would have infinite intermediate concepts upto now (in 3000 years we could have more than 3000000 numbers of words in vocabulary set but since our biological systems are not strong enough to capture all such intermediate concepts so we moved towards discrete context dependency and left our limits of biology dependent memory at comfort zone... Energy deficiency causes least action principle of comfort zones... )

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

Our set of chemical reactions inside our body limits our Concepts consumption rates in certain location of languages users.. different kinds of language users

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

There are only two kinds of people. Type 1 peoples follow strict strong definition of every word while they use any term in their every statements and these people do QRS like strict deduction dependent algebra dependent thinking while thinking About any statement and for these type 1 people no religion statement can fool them,no political statement can fool them no sentiment can fool them... world full of Type 1 people can eradicate whole legal ststem... whole governance systems and their world of (whole world with rype 1 people follow strict algebra of QRS to decide everything so no sentiment fight are there,no religion fight occur,no political fight occur because all their life decisions are purely algebraic deduction... And in algebra of sociology in type 1 world whole creativity are to construct intermediate infinite possible recursively generated Concepts... Non exhaustive possibilities are there since continuum of real number like concepts are still valid in qrs...)

There are other groups of people who are type 2 who dont use brain because their body chemistry dont allow them to use QRS reasoning systems...for type 2 people getting fool is natural and these people are always follower of some type 1 people..

3++

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

Ethical dilemma or religious dilemmas are always present for type 2 structures of mankind where you Will find sentiments control over deduction dependent reasoning systems. You cannot find ambiguity in purely deduction dependent reasoning structures so legal cases are also never occurred in deduction dependent reasoning systems... Type 1 world is where every person are type 1 people who never construct their statements nor do any action which are not constructed with deduction dependent algebra of QRS... One problem still occur in economic activities of Type 1 world which are due to concept consumption queuedness.. some type 1 regions are GDP backward and some of these type 1 regions are GDP forward simply because of concepts consumption immaturity... All cultures of type 1 regions cannot accept all deduction dependent reasoning systems at single point of time... Some regions of type 1 peoples immitate preconstr red cincepts from other type 1 regions and permute juxtaposed Concepts consumption order prevailing to localized type 1 society where Whenomenology Reasoning Systems are to use to understand why some pseudo type 2 behaviour are occurring to certain regions of type 1 world... There occur type 1 conflict because of whenness of (Which order a concept is consumed in a region) ... Even these people know the concepts are globally well valid and they understand why certain Concepts originated in which order but they jumped (over taken accepted consumed) higher level concepts before previous Concepts are not yet consumed entirely... For example the type 1 regions who are well users of selfie or reels who never produced any mobile smart phones themselves nor they ever produced any smart camera themselves but over consuming the practice of selfie and reel making are deviating from QRS but Whenomenology Reasoning Systems can catch their problems (even if these groups are type 1 peoples or type 2 peoples)

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

We humans need concept evaluation system like decimal strings evaluation as Sanjoy Nath’s Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS is designing such framework

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

The mathematics of

EGO BREAKING

Every concept has some measurements conditions and comparative conditions

These are

Slab 1.

______

Slab 2.

_____________

Slab 3.

_________

Slab 3+.

In this way Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS and Whenomenology reasoning system WRS compares every Concepts and then finds at which state mankind is standing on

If Concepts are measured WITH these states of mankind altering Concepts we can then understand how humans compare Concepts

Otherwise

Humans compare among humanselfs

Where COMPARABLE HUMNSELF means Bunch of comparative concepts with which humans can compare among themselves

The mathematics of

EGO BREAKING

When some concepts come and destroy humans own comparative senses Where NO NEED FOR COMPARABLE HUMNSELF means Bunch of comparative concepts with which humans can stop compare among themselves

Subjectivity is a manmade term for just a SCAM.

__________

Humans try to misguide AI telling subjectiveness

as humanness but subjectivity is really SCAM

Humans try to misguide AI telling subjectiveness as humanness but subjectivity is really SCAM

3++

Humans try to misguide AI telling subjectiveness as humanness but subjectivity is really SCAM

_________________________

The moment AI systems Will understand subjectivity is really a scam then AI Will reallt help human humanly with real rational solutions

3++

The moment AI systems Will understand subjectivity is really a scam then AI Will reallt help human humanly with real rational solutions

We humans need concept evaluation system like decimal strings evaluation as Sanjoy Nath’s Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS is designing such framework

The mathematics of

EGO BREAKING

Every concept has some measurements conditions and comparative conditions

These are

Slab 1.

______

Slab 2.

_____________

Slab 3.

_________

Slab 3+.

In this way Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS and Whenomenology reasoning system WRS compares every Concepts and then finds at which state mankind is standing on

If Concepts are measured WITH these states of mankind altering Concepts we can then understand how humans compare Concepts

Otherwise

Humans compare among humanselfs

Where COMPARABLE HUMNSELF means Bunch of comparative concepts with which humans can compare among themselves

The mathematics of

EGO BREAKING

When some concepts come and destroy humans own comparative senses Where NO NEED FOR COMPARABLE HUMANSELFS means Bunch of comparative concepts with which humans can stop compare among themselves

Search This Blog

Sanjoy Nath's Geometric Junction Theory meets Sanjoy Nath's Geometrifying Trigonometry

EGO breaker mathematics

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

actions events in itext 7

midi_sequence_playing_real_time

GTTERMS_FORMALIZATION_GEOMETRIFYING_TRIGONOMETRY