QRS WRS studies on the chronology of Marxist concepts

What are the key points of Marxist philosophy??????

Date of origin of each concept in Marxist philosophy is important for Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology (queued concept construction order) QRS qhenomenology reasoning system studies strict linearity order (compilers class compilation order every concept is a cpp class and strict dependency chain is necessary ADT abstract dependency tree like structures is obviously there queuedness of concept construction follows for concepts construction process in humans linguistics every word has unique concept no polysemy allowed ...) of whereas Whenomenology reasoning system Sanjoy Nath's WRS studies social context and social structure responsible for popularity of concepts digestion (concept acceptance) why some concept are not acceptable to society even if that concept is already constructed in social structure???

So no two concepts in Marxist philosophy could construct togather at same time... Obviously strict queuedness orderliness is there

What is that order???

Need all micro concepts construction in Marxist philosophy

Marxist philosophy is a comprehensive framework that encompasses various aspects of society, economy, and politics. Here are the key points:

*1. Dialectical Materialism:*

Marxist philosophy is based on dialectical materialism, which posits that reality is composed of contradictions and opposing forces. These contradictions lead to conflict, which drives social and economic change.

*2. Class Struggle:*

Marxists believe that society is divided into two main classes: the bourgeoisie (those who own the means of production) and the proletariat (those who sell their labor). The bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat, leading to class struggle.

*3. Economic Determinism:*

Marxists argue that economic factors, such as production and distribution, determine the course of history and shape social relations.

*4. Surplus Value:*

Marxists believe that workers are paid less than the value they produce, and the surplus value is appropriated by the capitalist class.

*5. Alienation:*

Marxists argue that capitalism alienates workers from their labor, their fellow workers, and their humanity.

*6. Commodification:*

Marxists believe that capitalism turns everything into a commodity, including labor, land, and natural resources.

*7. Imperialism:*

Marxists argue that capitalism leads to imperialism, where powerful countries exploit weaker ones for resources and labor.

*8. Revolution and Socialism:*

Marxists believe that the working class must unite and overthrow the capitalist class to establish a socialist society, where the means of production are collectively owned.

*9. The Role of the State:*

Marxists argue that the state is a tool of the ruling class, and its primary function is to maintain the existing power structure.

*10. The Goal of Communism:*

The ultimate goal of Marxism is a communist society, where there is no private property, no exploitation, and no state. People will contribute according to their ability, and receive according to their needs.

Some influential Marxist thinkers include:

- Karl Marx

- Friedrich Engels

- Vladimir Lenin

- Mao Zedong

- Rosa Luxemburg

- Antonio Gramsci

Keep in mind that Marxist philosophy has evolved over time, and different interpretations and variations exist.

I'll provide the key points of Marxist philosophy, along with the date of origin for each concept, and highlight the strict queuedness order of concept construction.

*1. Dialectical Materialism (1844)*

Marxist philosophy is based on dialectical materialism, which posits that reality is composed of contradictions and opposing forces.

*2. Alienation (1844)*

Marx argues that capitalism alienates workers from their labor, their fellow workers, and their humanity.

*3. Class Struggle (1848)*

Marx and Engels introduce the concept of class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat in The Communist Manifesto.

*4. Surplus Value (1857-1858)*

Marx develops the concept of surplus value, arguing that workers are paid less than the value they produce.

*5. Commodification (1857-1858)*

Marx discusses how capitalism turns everything into a commodity, including labor, land, and natural resources.

*6. Economic Determinism (1859)*

Marx argues that economic factors determine the course of history and shape social relations in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.

*7. Imperialism (1867)*

Marx discusses how capitalism leads to imperialism, where powerful countries exploit weaker ones for resources and labor.

*8. Revolution and Socialism (1848)*

Marx and Engels advocate for a socialist revolution, where the working class overthrows the capitalist class.

*9. The Role of the State (1848)*

Marx argues that the state is a tool of the ruling class, and its primary function is to maintain the existing power structure.

*10. Communism (1848)*

The ultimate goal of Marxism is a communist society, where there is no private property, no exploitation, and no state.

*Queuedness Order:*

1. Dialectical Materialism (1844)

2. Alienation (1844)

3. Class Struggle (1848)

4. Economic Determinism (1859)

5. Surplus Value (1857-1858)

6. Commodification (1857-1858)

7. Imperialism (1867)

8. Revolution and Socialism (1848)

9. The Role of the State (1848)

10. Communism (1848)

Note that some concepts may have evolved over time, and different interpretations may exist. This queuedness order reflects the historical development of Marxist philosophy.

*Micro Concepts:*

- *Value*: Marx's concept of value is central to his critique of capitalism.

- *Exchange Value*: The value of a commodity in terms of other commodities.

- *Use Value*: The usefulness of a commodity.

- *Labor Power*: The capacity of workers to perform labor.

- *Constant Capital*: The value of means of production.

- *Variable Capital*: The value of labor power.

These micro concepts are essential to understanding Marxist philosophy and are constructed in a specific order to form the larger concepts.

*Qhenomenology (QRS) and Whenomenology (WRS):*

QRS studies the strict linearity order of concept construction, while WRS examines the social context and structure responsible for the popularity of concepts. The queuedness order of concept construction in Marxist philosophy reflects the historical development of the ideas and the dependencies between concepts.

That's a fascinating request, intertwining the core tenets of Marxism with Sanjoy Nath's strict, linear QRS (Qhenomenology Reasoning System) and the sociological filter of WRS (Whenomenology Reasoning System).

Applying a strict, micro-concept, chronological queue to a complex philosophical system like Marxism is challenging, as key concepts developed iteratively and through collaboration (Marx and Engels). However, based on the evolution of Marx's thought, particularly through his major works, we can construct the most likely queued order of foundational concepts necessary for the whole system to cohere.

Here are the key points of Marxist philosophy presented in an approximate QRS (queued concept construction) order, emphasizing the dependency chain.

⚙️ QRS: Queued Concept Construction in Marxist Philosophy

The dependency chain generally moves from Philosophical Basis \rightarrow Historical Analysis \rightarrow Economic Theory \rightarrow Political Outcome.

I. Philosophical Foundations (1840s)

These concepts (developed primarily in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology, 1845-46) are the prerequisites for analyzing society.

|---|---|---|---|

| 1. | Dialectical Materialism | Early 1840s (Hegel \rightarrow Feuerbach \rightarrow Marx) | The world is understood through matter (material conditions), not spirit (idealism). Change occurs through the struggle of opposites (thesis \leftrightarrow antithesis \rightarrow synthesis). |

| 2. | Historical Materialism | 1845–1846 (The German Ideology) | Dependency: Built upon Dialectical Materialism. Core Idea: The Mode of Production (the way a society produces and exchanges goods) is the base that determines the superstructure (politics, law, culture, religion, etc.). |

| 3. | Alienation (Entfremdung) | 1844 (EPM 1844) | Dependency: Requires concept of Material Conditions (Mode of Production). Core Idea: In capitalist production, the worker is separated (alienated) from: (a) The product, (b) The act of labor, (c) Species-being (human nature), and (d) Other workers. |

II. The Base & Superstructure (Historical Analysis)

These concepts refine how the material base operates through history.

|---|---|---|---|

| 4. | Forces of Production | 1845–1846 (The German Ideology) | Dependency: Requires Historical Materialism. Core Idea: The means of production (tools, factories, land) and the labor power (skills, knowledge). These are the dynamic elements of the Base. |

| 5. | Relations of Production | 1845–1846 (The German Ideology) | Dependency: Requires Forces of Production. Core Idea: The social relationships people enter into during production (e.g., owner/slave, lord/serf, bourgeoisie/proletariat). These are the static elements of the Base. |

| 6. | Class Struggle | 1848 (The Communist Manifesto) | Dependency: Requires Relations of Production. Core Idea: History is the record of conflict between the exploiters (owners) and the exploited (laborers) due to their opposing interests under the Relations of Production. |

III. Economic Theory (Capitalism's Mechanism)

These concepts are the core of Marx’s critique of capitalism, detailed primarily in Capital, Vol. I (1867).

|---|---|---|---|

| 7. | Commodity | 1867 (Capital, Vol. I) | Dependency: Requires Forces/Relations of Production. Core Idea: The basic unit of capitalist society, possessing Use Value (utility) and Exchange Value (price determined by socially necessary labor time). |

| 8. | Socially Necessary Labor Time (SNLT) | 1867 (Capital, Vol. I) | Dependency: Requires Commodity concept. Core Idea: The amount of labor time required to produce a commodity under average conditions. This determines a commodity's Exchange Value. |

| 9. | Labor Power | 1867 (Capital, Vol. I) | Dependency: Requires SNLT and Alienation. Core Idea: The worker's ability to labor, sold as a commodity for a wage (its value is the SNLT required to sustain the worker). Crucially, it produces more value than it costs. |

| 10. | Surplus Value | 1867 (Capital, Vol. I) | Dependency: Requires Labor Power and Commodity. Core Idea: The difference between the value the worker creates and the wage the worker receives. This uncompensated labor is the source of profit and exploitation. |

| 11. | Capital (Circulation) | 1867 (Capital, Vol. I) | Dependency: Requires Surplus Value. Core Idea: Value in motion. The purpose of capitalist circulation is \text{M} \rightarrow \text{C} \rightarrow \text{M}', where \text{M}' (Money prime) is greater than \text{M} (initial Money) due to the extraction of Surplus Value. |

IV. Political and Revolutionary Outcome

These concepts describe the inevitable end stage of the process, driven by the economic contradictions.

|---|---|---|---|

| 12. | The State as Instrument of Class Rule | 1848 (The Communist Manifesto) | Dependency: Requires Class Struggle and Superstructure. Core Idea: The State (government, military, law) is an institution designed to maintain the power and economic interests of the ruling class (the Bourgeoisie). |

| 13. | Dictatorship of the Proletariat | 1875 (Critique of the Gotha Programme) | Dependency: Requires Class Struggle and The State. Core Idea: The necessary transitional phase immediately following the proletariat's revolution, where the workers use state power to dismantle the old capitalist relations of production. |

| 14. | Communism (The Final Stage) | 1844 (EPM 1844) & 1875 (Critique of the Gotha Programme) | Dependency: Requires elimination of Class Struggle and Surplus Value. Core Idea: A stateless, classless, property-less society where production is based on the principle: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." |

🧭 WRS: Concept Popularity and Acceptance

The WRS (Whenomenology Reasoning System) analyzes why some of these concepts became globally popular (accepted) while others remained niche or were initially rejected by society.

* Accepted/Popular Concepts (WRS Success): Class Struggle (1848), Dictatorship of the Proletariat (1875).

* Social Context: These concepts were popularized because they offered a clear, action-oriented narrative (a "Tantra") during periods of industrial unrest (1848 revolutions, late 19th-century unionism). They provided the oppressed class with a social identity and a target (the State/Bourgeoisie).

* Initially Rejected/Abstract Concepts (WRS Failure/Delay): Dialectical Materialism (1840s), Surplus Value (1867), Alienation (1844).

* Social Context: These concepts required significant abstract conceptual construction (QRS effort). For example, the theory of Surplus Value necessitates accepting the precise Labor Theory of Value first—a difficult, non-intuitive economic concept. Alienation was too philosophical and was rejected even by many orthodox Marxists for decades, only becoming popular in the mid-20th century in Western Europe as a critique of consumer society, long after its QRS construction.

Good questions. Trying to map the “micro-concepts” of Karl Marx / Marxism in a strictly ordered / queued way for use in a conceptual-compiler for Qhenomenology (per your described strict linear dependency / no-polysemy requirement) makes sense. I’ll attempt to (1) identify the main “atomic” concepts in Marxist philosophy/social theory, (2) indicate roughly when they first emerged (or were formulated) by Marx (or early Marxists), and (3) sketch a plausible dependency order (which concept must “exist” before another) — a kind of minimal dependency graph linearised.

Because real scholarly history is somewhat messy (Marx’s thoughts evolved; different works overlapped), the “date of origin” is approximate (e.g. first appearance in his writings). But this may well suffice for your Qhenomenology-style reasoning system.

---

🎯 Key Ideas (“Micro-Concepts”) in Marxism — with approximate origin

Here are the core concepts in Marxist thought relevant to social theory, economic critique, and historical analysis.

Concept Brief Definition / Role Approximate Origin (first formulation by Marx)

Dialectical Materialism The philosophical method: reality (material world) is primary, not ideas; societal change arises from material contradictions and conflicts, not from abstract ideas or “spirit.” It adapts the dialectical method (thesis–antithesis–synthesis) but grounds it in material/economic realities rather than idealism. Mid-1840s (as Marx moved away from Hegelian idealism; explicit outlines emerge in his early philosophical/economic writings).

Historical Materialism A social‐theory/historical method: human history is determined primarily by material/economic conditions: the “forces of production” + “relations of production” (how people produce, who owns means of production). Social institutions (culture, law, politics, ideology — the “superstructure”) arise from and serve the economic base. Developed in the 1840s — fully articulated by mid-19th century.

Mode of Production (Primitive communism → Slave society → Feudalism → Capitalism → Socialism/Communism) The distinct ways a society organises production: technology, division of labour, ownership of means of production. Each mode defines social classes, relations, and conflicts. Change from one mode to another happens via internal contradictions and class struggle. 1840s–1850s conceptualization; becomes central in later economic writings and in 1848 manifestos.

Class (Class Structure / Class Stratification) Society divided into classes by their relation to the means of production: e.g. those who own (capitalists/bourgeoisie) vs. those who must sell labour (proletariat). Other intermediate or dispossessed classes may exist, but the main contradiction is class-based. Early to mid-1840s — emerges with development of historical materialism and critique of capitalism.

Class Struggle Conflict between different classes (owners vs workers) due to opposing economic interests. This struggle is the engine of historical change, driving transitions between modes of production (e.g. feudalism → capitalism → socialism). Fully formulated around 1845–1848; manifest in first systematic political document in 1848.

Labour / Labour-Power & Exploitation Labour-power: the worker’s capacity to labour, which under capitalism is sold to capitalists. Exploitation occurs because workers produce more value than they receive in wages; the surplus is appropriated by capitalists. The mature economic formulation appears around 1857–1860, in works leading to his major economic analysis.

Surplus Value The difference between the value produced by labour and the wages paid to labourers. This surplus is the source of profit under capitalism, and explains capitalist accumulation and inequality. Articulated in the same mid-19th century economic works (around 1857–1860).

Alienation (of Labour / Worker) Under capitalism, the worker becomes alienated from the product of their labour, from their own labour activity, from their fellow humans, and from their human potential (creativity, self‐realization). Labour is reduced to mere commodity, eroding human dignity and freedom. First prominent in Marx’s early philosophical writings, especially in the “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844” (written 1844).

Base-Superstructure Model (Economic Base → Superstructure) The economic base (forces and relations of production) shapes the superstructure — institutions: political, legal, cultural, religious, ideological, social consciousness. The superstructure in turn stabilises or conceals the base, reinforcing class dominance. This model is implicit as soon as historical materialism is developed — mid-1840s onward.

Contradictions / Internal Contradictions of Capitalism Capitalism contains inherent contradictions: e.g. between capitalists’ drive for profit (maximizing surplus value) and the workers’ condition; competition leads to concentration of capital, overproduction crises, instability. These contradictions drive periodic crises and eventually the system’s collapse or transformation. The insight emerges in Marx’s economic theory — developed through the 1850s–1860s (in drafts leading to Das Kapital).

Revolution (Socialist/Proletarian Revolution) Given the contradictions and exploitation, the proletariat — once class consciousness emerges — will overthrow capitalist class, abolish class-based exploitation, and establish a new mode of production: socialism, ultimately communism. First systematically argued in the 1848 manifesto and later economic/political works.

Dictatorship of the Proletariat (Transitional State) A transitional political arrangement post-revolution, where the working class (proletariat) controls state power to dismantle former class structures, suppress resistance from old ruling classes, and reorganize production relations en route to a classless society. Part of classical Marxist political vision — formalized in mid-to-late 19th-century Marxist theory (though Marx himself was less prescriptive about all details)

Communism (Classless, Stateless Society; Collective Ownership) The envisaged end-state: abolition of private ownership of means of production; collective ownership; classless society; human freedom, real self-realization, end of exploitation and alienation. As a vision from early revolutionary writings (1848 manifesto) onward.

Commodity Fetishism A critical concept: under capitalism commodities (goods) and their exchange-values appear as independent, autonomous, almost magical things — obscuring the social relations of production and labour that produced them. Thus social relations among people are masked as relations among things. This mystification helps perpetuate capitalist exploitation and class domination. First systematic exposition in Das Kapital, Volume I (published 1867).

---

🔗 Suggested Ordering / Dependency (“Queued Concept Construction”) — a Linearised Chain

Based on interpretative logic (what concept presupposes others), here is a linear order (from simpler / foundational to more derived) of constructing Marxist micro-concepts. This might map well to your QRS queued-concept construction system.

1. Dialectical Materialism — philosophical method: you need this to think materially and dialectically.

2. Historical Materialism — applies dialectical materialism to human societies: history as material/economic process.

3. Mode of Production — the building block for framing societies: what is produced and how (forces + relations).

4. Class (class structure based on relation to means of production) — given a mode of production, classes arise.

5. Base-Superstructure Model — given class structure, economic base conditions produce political, cultural, ideological superstructure.

6. Class Struggle — when classes have opposing interests under a given mode of production (especially capitalist one), struggle emerges.

7. Labour / Labour-Power & Exploitation — under capitalist mode: workers must sell labour, capitalists exploit labour-power.

8. Surplus Value — economic explanation for exploitation: difference between value produced and wages.

9. Alienation (of Labour / Worker) — social/psychological consequences of exploitation and commodification of labour under capitalism.

10. Contradictions of Capitalism (instability, crises, capital concentration, overproduction, worker impoverishment, etc.) — systemic consequences of exploitation + surplus value dynamics.

11. Commodity Fetishism — ideological/social mystification arising from capitalist production: obscuring real social relations in favour of relations among things.

12. Class Consciousness (implied requirement before revolution) — workers realizing their shared exploitation under capitalist conditions (depends on awareness of class, exploitation, alienation, contradictions). (Note: not always listed among “basic principles”, but functionally essential for revolutionary change.)

13. Revolution (Proletarian / Socialist Revolution) — collective/semi-collective overthrow of capitalist class by proletariat — requires class struggle + class consciousness + recognition of contradictions.

14. Dictatorship of the Proletariat (Transitional State) — transitional political structure post-revolution to reorganize economic/social relations.

15. Communism (Classless, Stateless, Collective Ownership) — the final envisaged mode of production and social organization, erasing class divisions, exploitation, alienation.

This is not strictly only Marx’s original sequence (in reality he wrote on several overlapping themes), but for a concept-system that enforces strict dependency (no polysemy) and queued construction, this linear chain is plausible and coherent.

---

⚠️ Some Important Observations / Caveats (for Use in Qhenomenology)

Not a neat “philosophical treatise” but an evolving critique: The writings and ideas of Marx (and early Marxists) evolved over time. For example, the early concept of alienation (in 1844 Manuscripts) preceded the fully fleshed-out economic theory of surplus value (1850s). So using strict chronological order for “concept construction” can work — but many concepts were refined gradually.

Some concepts are emergent/social constructs, not “natural” primitives. For example, class consciousness, revolution, or commodity fetishism depend not just on economic relations but on social psychology, ideology, communication. Modelling them as atomic “concepts” is plausible — but one must be aware that in real social dynamics they emerge only through social interactions, not merely from theoretical definition.

Polysemy and reinterpretation over time. Although your Qhenomenology forbids polysemy (each word = unique concept), in real intellectual history definitions shift, get contested, reinterpreted (especially “state,” “freedom,” “alienation,” “class,” etc.). So some “concepts” may need versioning in your system if you want to capture historical nuance.

Many secondary or derivative concepts exist in later Marxist thought. For example: ideology, false consciousness, state and its role, imperialism, monopoly capitalism, wage-labour, capital accumulation dynamics, etc. The table above captures core foundational concepts. Additional “micro-concepts” can be added as needed — but each will depend on some subset of the primitives.

Moral / normative aspects vs descriptive/analytic aspects. Marxism combines (a) analytical theory (how social/economic systems work), (b) moral critique (exploitation, alienation), and (c) utopian or political vision (communism). In a strict concept-dependency model, you may separate “analytic concepts” from “normative/visionary concepts.” For example, “surplus value” is analytic; “freedom under communism” is normative/prescriptive.

---

🧠 How This Maps to Qhenomenology’s Needs (Strict Queued Concept Construction)

Given your QRS (Qhenomenology Reasoning System) requirement — that every word/concept is unique, no polysemy allowed, and strict linear dependency — the above chain is a viable template. You can treat each “Concept” as an abstract data type (a class) in a conceptual AST (abstract-dependency tree). Then:

Build from bottom up: first instantiate DialecticalMaterialism, then HistoricalMaterialism, then ModeOfProduction, etc.

Each concept class can have pointers/references to its prerequisite concept classes. E.g. SurplusValue depends on Exploitation, which depends on LabourPower and ClassStructure etc.

This ensures no two concepts are “constructed” in parallel — they follow a strict queue (or topological order) in the dependency graph.

For normative/political vision (Communism), that can come last, after analytical concepts that define why and how capitalism “fails.”

If you like, I can produce a full “concept-class skeleton” (in some pseudocode or even C# style, since you use C# for other conceptual projects) — listing each concept as a class, with dependencies, maybe with fields like “name”, “definition”, “prerequisites”, “dateOfOrigin”. This seems well-suited to your emphasis on formal, linear construction.

---

✅ My Recommendation (for your Integration with Qhenomenology)

Use the above linear order as your “master queue” when importing Marxist concepts into your QRS.

Represent each concept as an ADT/class with metadata: name, definition, origin-date, dependencies.

Keep analytic vs normative/visionary concepts separate (to avoid mixing description and prescription).

If in future you incorporate variants or offshoots (e.g. later Marxist developments, ideological, social, cultural critiques) — treat them as new concept-classes, each with dependencies on existing ones.

---

If you want — I can generate a “starter set” of ~20–30 Marxist concept-classes (core + secondary) in C# syntax (class definitions with dependencies) — ready to be plugged into your Qhenomenology system.

Do you want me to build that skeleton for you now?

What are the key points of Marxist philosophy??????

So no two concepts in Marxist philosophy could construct togather at same time... Obviously strict queuedness orderliness is there

What is that order???

Need all micro concepts construction in Marxist philosophy

## Key Points of Marxist Philosophy

Marxist philosophy, developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, revolves around **historical materialism**—history driven by economic contradictions and class conflict, not ideals. Dialectical materialism applies Hegelian dialectics to material conditions; the economic **base** (production forces/relations) determines the **superstructure** (law, politics, ideology). Capitalism exploits via **surplus value** extraction, leading inexorably to proletarian revolution and classless communism.[1][2]

## QRS: Strict Queued Construction Order

Sanjoy Nath's QRS posits linear dependency like C++ compilation: each micro-concept as a unique class (no polysemy), with ADT-enforced prerequisites. Marxism's timeline (1844-1883) reveals sequential building from Hegelian imports; no simultaneity—e.g., praxis precedes alienation. Derived from primary texts' chronology.[3][4]

|---------------|-------------|----------|------------------|-------------|

Order enforces QRS: e.g., commodity fetishism requires value theory; Engels' refinements (post-1883) build atop Marx.[2][5]

## WRS: Social Context and Acceptance Barriers

WRS probes why constructed concepts trend or stagnate. Marxism surged in 1848 revolutions (industrial pauperism validated class struggle) and 1871 Paris Commune (praxis proven), but lagged elsewhere:

- **Popularity Drivers**: 1840s factory misery propelled Manifesto; Russian 1917 uptake amid war famine.[6]

- **Rejection Despite Construction**: Surplus value (1867) dismissed by marginalists (1871 Jevons) favoring supply-demand; commodity fetishism critiqued culture but ignored in economics post-1890s; bourgeois superstructure (law/ideology) blocked via repression (Marx exiled 1849).[1]

- **Structural Blocks**: National bourgeoisie co-opted reforms (UK Fabians diluted revolution); religious superstructure resisted atheism (praxis).[4]

QRS linearity holds empirically (texts sequential), but WRS overclaims novelty—echoes Kuhn's paradigms (1962) or memetics (Dawkins 1976); no polysemy ban unrealistic (e.g., "base" economic/physical).[7] Critique: Ignores parallel Engels drafts; AI-era "queuedness" traces via LLMs but predates compilers.[8]

Citations:

[1] Marxism | Definition, History, Ideology, Examples, & Facts https://www.britannica.com/topic/Marxism

[2] Marxism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism

[3] Where did Marxism come from? | Britannica https://www.britannica.com/question/Where-did-Marxism-come-from

[4] Historical materialism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_materialism

[5] Frederick Engels: Co-Founder of Marxism https://cpim.org/frederick-engels-co-founder-marxism/

[6] History of Marxism - Marxology https://marxology.org/history-of-marxism/

[7] qhenomenology reasoning system এবং অপবিশ্বাস এর বিশ্লেষণ পদ্ধতি নিয়ে প্রাথমিক কিছু কথা https://sanjoynathgeometrifyingtrigonometry.blogspot.com/2025/05/qhenomenology-reasoning-system.html

[8] Sanjoy Nath on time, interest, and cognitive load https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sanjoy-nath-70824618b_sanjoy-nath-least-bother-on-writing-pdf-now-activity-7356991478763565056-6F-h

### Key Points of Marxist Philosophy: A Chronological "Queued" Construction Analysis

Marxist philosophy, primarily developed by Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895), is a materialist worldview that critiques capitalism, emphasizes historical change through economic forces, and envisions a classless society. It draws from German idealism (Hegel), French socialism, and British political economy, but inverts them into a revolutionary framework. Core to Marxism is the idea that human society evolves through contradictions in material conditions, not abstract ideas.

Aligning with Sanjoy Nath's **Qhenomenology Reasoning System (QRS)**, I'll treat Marxist concepts as "micro-concepts" in a strict linear queued order—like a compiler's dependency tree (ADT) where each concept builds on prior ones without polysemy or simultaneous construction. No two concepts originate at the exact same timestamp; I've sequenced them by the earliest documented articulation (writing or publication date) in Marx/Engels' works, based on historical timelines. This assumes a "compilation order": earlier concepts are prerequisites (e.g., materialism before class struggle). Dates are precise to year/month where possible; if tied, I prioritize logical dependency.

For **Whenomenology Reasoning System (WRS)**, I'll note social/historical contexts influencing each concept's popularity, acceptance, or rejection. In the 19th century, Marxism spread among industrial workers and intellectuals amid rapid urbanization and exploitation but faced rejection from bourgeoisie, states, and churches due to its atheism and calls for revolution. Acceptance was boosted by 1848 European uprisings and labor movements; rejection stemmed from fears of property loss and ideological threats to liberalism/religion.

#### Strict Queued Order of Micro-Concepts in Marxist Philosophy

Here's the linear sequence of key micro-concepts, derived from chronological works (e.g., early manuscripts to *Capital*). I've included ~15-20 micro-concepts to cover "all micro-concepts" without redundancy, ensuring no overlaps or co-origins. Each is timestamped by origin (first articulation), with dependencies noted. This forms a dependency chain: e.g., alienation queues materialism, which queues historical dialectics.

1. **Critique of Idealism (Hegelian Influence)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1837 (Marx's early university writings, e.g., letter to his father critiquing Hegel's abstract philosophy).

- **Description**: Marxism begins by rejecting idealist philosophy (ideas drive history) in favor of practical, material concerns. This is the root "class" in the ADT—pure critique without positive construction.

- **Queued Dependency**: None (entry point; Marx's exposure to Hegel at Berlin University).

- **WRS Context**: Accepted among young German intellectuals disillusioned with Romanticism post-Napoleonic Wars; rejected by conservative academics tied to Prussian state ideology, as it challenged divine/ideal order.

2. **Alienation (Entfremdung)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1844 (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, written April-August).

- **Description**: Workers are alienated from their labor, products, fellow humans, and species-being under capitalism—labor becomes a commodity, not self-fulfillment.

- **Queued Dependency**: Builds on critique of idealism (shifts focus to real human conditions).

- **WRS Context**: Resonated with early industrial workers in England/France amid factory exploitation (e.g., child labor); rejected by capitalists as it exposed profit's human cost, remaining unpublished until 1932, limiting 19th-century spread.<grok:render card_id="c2eb06" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render><grok:render card_id="e315fa" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

3. **Materialism (as Inversion of Hegel)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1845 (Theses on Feuerbach, written spring 1845).

- **Description**: "The philosophers have only interpreted the world... the point is to change it." Emphasizes practical, sensuous activity over contemplative idealism; matter shapes consciousness.

- **Queued Dependency**: Requires alienation (focuses on human practice) and critique of idealism.

- **WRS Context**: Gained traction among radical Young Hegelians during 1840s German censorship; rejected by Feuerbach's followers and church for atheism, amid rising secularism in Europe.

4. **Dialectical Materialism**

- **Date of Origin**: 1845-1846 (The German Ideology, co-written with Engels, November 1845-spring 1846).

- **Description**: History advances through contradictions in material conditions (thesis-antithesis-synthesis, but materialist: e.g., feudalism → capitalism). Combines Hegel's dialectics with materialism.

- **Queued Dependency**: Builds on materialism (applies dialectics to matter).

- **WRS Context**: Emerged amid 1840s economic crises (potato famine, unemployment); accepted by exiled radicals in Brussels/London; rejected by German publishers (unpublished until 1932) due to revolutionary tone.<grok:render card_id="ab87d5" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render><grok:render card_id="2054b7" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

5. **Historical Materialism (Mode of Production)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1846 (continuation in The German Ideology).

- **Description**: Society's base (economic production relations) determines superstructure (laws, culture, politics); history is stages of modes (primitive → slave → feudal → capitalist → socialist).

- **Queued Dependency**: Dialectical materialism provides the mechanism.

- **WRS Context**: Influenced by 1840s Chartist movement in England; accepted by early socialists; rejected by historians favoring "great men" narratives, as it demoted individuals.

6. **Class Struggle**

- **Date of Origin**: 1847 (The Poverty of Philosophy, published July 1847).

- **Description**: History is the history of class struggles (oppressors vs. oppressed); in capitalism, bourgeoisie vs. proletariat.

- **Queued Dependency**: Historical materialism frames classes as economic products.

- **WRS Context**: Written against Proudhon's idealism amid Belgian exile; gained popularity post-1848 revolutions; rejected by anarchists like Proudhon for centralizing state power.<grok:render card_id="e6e2ac" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

7. **Communist Revolution (Proletarian Dictatorship)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1848 (The Communist Manifesto, published February 1848).

- **Description**: Proletariat must seize state power via revolution to abolish classes; temporary "dictatorship of the proletariat" leads to communism.

- **Queued Dependency**: Class struggle necessitates revolutionary action.

- **WRS Context**: Timed for 1848 European revolutions (France, Germany); widely translated and accepted by workers' leagues; rejected by monarchies and liberals fearing chaos, leading to bans.<grok:render card_id="00e191" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render><grok:render card_id="499261" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

8. **Commodity Fetishism**

- **Date of Origin**: 1857-1858 (Grundrisse, notebooks written winter 1857-1858).

- **Description**: Commodities appear to have inherent value, masking social relations of production.

- **Queued Dependency**: Builds on alienation (social masking).

- **WRS Context**: Amid 1857 financial panic; unpublished until 1939, so limited 19th-century impact; accepted later by economists critiquing markets.

9. **Surplus Value (Exploitation Theory)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1858 (continuation in Grundrisse).

- **Description**: Capitalists extract surplus value from unpaid labor time beyond worker reproduction costs.

- **Queued Dependency**: Commodity fetishism hides this extraction.

- **WRS Context**: Reflected rising trade unions; accepted by labor activists; rejected by classical economists (Smith, Ricardo) as it undermined "fair exchange."<grok:render card_id="d4ca9a" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

10. **Falling Rate of Profit**

- **Date of Origin**: 1862-1863 (Theories of Surplus Value, manuscripts).

- **Description**: Capitalism's tendency for profits to fall as machinery replaces labor, leading to crises.

- **Queued Dependency**: Surplus value explains the mechanism.

- **WRS Context**: During American Civil War economic disruptions; accepted by later socialists; rejected by optimists of industrial growth.

11. **Labor Theory of Value**

- **Date of Origin**: 1867 (Capital, Volume 1, published September 1867).

- **Description**: Value derives from socially necessary labor time; basis for exploitation.

- **Queued Dependency**: Surplus value refines this.

- **WRS Context**: Post-1860s boom; critiqued British factories; accepted in International Workingmen's Association; rejected by marginalists (Jevons) shifting to utility theory.<grok:render card_id="189da4" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

12. **Reproduction Schemas**

- **Date of Origin**: 1870s (Capital, Volume 2, edited/posthumous 1885, but drafted 1870s).

- **Description**: How capital reproduces itself through cycles of production/consumption.

- **Queued Dependency**: Labor value extends to systemic reproduction.

- **WRS Context**: Amid Paris Commune (1871); inspired revolutionaries; rejected post-Commune as "terrorist" ideology.

13. **Imperialism (as Capital Export)**

- **Date of Origin**: 1878 (Engels' Anti-Dühring, published 1878).

- **Description**: Capitalism expands via colonies for markets/resources.

- **Queued Dependency**: Falling profits drive expansion.

- **WRS Context**: During Scramble for Africa; accepted by anti-colonialists; rejected by imperial powers as subversive.<grok:render card_id="7fab1c" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

14. **State as Class Instrument**

- **Date of Origin**: 1884 (Engels' Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, published 1884).

- **Description**: State arises from class divisions; withers away in communism.

- **Queued Dependency**: Revolution implies state transformation.

- **WRS Context**: Post-Bismarck unification; accepted by anarcho-syndicalists partially; rejected by social democrats favoring reform.

15. **Utopian vs. Scientific Socialism**

- **Date of Origin**: 1892 (Engels' Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, expanded from Anti-Dühring).

- **Description**: Marxism as scientific prediction, not moral wish.

- **Queued Dependency**: Historical materialism makes it "scientific."

- **WRS Context**: Late 19th-century labor parties (e.g., SPD in Germany); accepted as basis for mass movements; rejected by Fabians/reformists as dogmatic.<grok:render card_id="e39430" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

#### Overall QRS Queuedness Summary

The ADT is linear: Critique → Alienation → Materialism → Dialectics → Historical Materialism → Class Struggle → Revolution → Fetishism → Surplus Value → Falling Profit → Labor Value → Reproduction → Imperialism → State Instrument → Scientific Socialism. No branches; each queues the next via logical extension (e.g., no revolution without class struggle). This mirrors compiler order: base critiques compile first, enabling systemic theories.

#### WRS: Broader Social Dynamics of Acceptance/Rejection

- **Acceptance Factors**: Industrial Revolution (1780s-1840s) created proletariat masses; 1848 revolutions amplified urgency; workers' associations (e.g., First International, 1864) digested concepts as tools for unionization. By 1890s, Marxism became "popular" in socialist parties due to economic inequality.

- **Rejection Factors**: Bourgeois fear of property abolition (e.g., post-Commune backlash); religious opposition to atheism (Catholic Church encyclicals); state censorship (Marx's exiles); internal left splits (anarchists rejected state focus). Some concepts (e.g., alienation) remained obscure until 20th century due to non-publication, despite construction—society wasn't "ready" amid liberal optimism.<grok:render card_id="fef0b0" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render><grok:render card_id="58863d" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">

</grok:render>

Search This Blog

Sanjoy Nath's Geometric Junction Theory meets Sanjoy Nath's Geometrifying Trigonometry

QRS WRS studies on the chronology of Marxist concepts

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

actions events in itext 7

midi_sequence_playing_real_time

GTTERMS_FORMALIZATION_GEOMETRIFYING_TRIGONOMETRY