Sanjoy Nath's Geometric Junction Theory meets Sanjoy Nath's Geometrifying Trigonometry

BRAHMIN SUDRA TRAP/SUDRA BRAHMIN TRAP Sanjoy Nath's new research on QRS (qhenomenology reasoning system queuedness of concept construction Q for queuedness claims that such kind of research was not possible before conception of AI advent)WRS (Whenomenology reasoning system studies when at what social context and why on social structure certain concept gets popular Trend of uses) Is that similar situation as AI Machine Learning versus Humans learning Trap???????? Do Machine learn to write human understandable theories?????????? Do machines treat humans as sudras??? Do human treats learn_ed (when for a machine the machine learning complete for a certain domain and when the machine is lear_ed enough to do things automatically) machine as Brahmin???????? Critically analyse criticise novelty search for novelty of such trap and such kind of reasoning Analyse criticise deeply BRAHMIN SUDRA TRAP/SUDRA BRAHMIN TRAP Is that similar situation as AI Machine Learning versus Humans learning Trap...

FLOWER PETAL representation of numbers (Dont confuse this theory is fractal construction from real numbers and this theory is different from "numbers are triangle and triangle are numbers" ... That theory is different Theory because that theory is attached to Geometrifying Trigonometry and SNGT calculus)... Flower petals representation of numbers is different Theory.. Incomplete Reachability versus complete reachability on space NEW PHILOSOPHY OF "DIRECTION AS DIMENSION" AND "DIMENSIONS ARE DIRECTIONS ON 2D EUCLIDEAN SPACES" (every unique direction on 2D Euclidean space can represent different dimensions since these are not mixable so not addable in Sanjoy Nath's Geometrifying Trigonometry philosophy of real numbers construction systems reasoning systems) Strict note that This "FLOWER PETAL representation of numbers" is different theory of Sanjoy Nath. Dont confuse this Theory of numbers representation with Sanjoy Nath's"Theory o...