Sanjoy Nath's economics of exponential series

Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry models a "society and economics of zero distraction world" and "society and economics of complete distraction world"

Highest energy consumed 

In human body when 

You distract and get back to focus 

This refocussing energy is not calculated in daily life and all politics are done through distracting people. This is well known princiole that refocussing back to peoples own focus (peoples own purpose focus) consumes so much energy that it violates least action principles (Lagranges action is energy ×time which Sanjoy Nath interpretes as total focus energy held for how long? And also Sanjoy Nath's theory of econophysics deals with total action for all humans activities and how long each such activities continue continuously and how many times distraction and refocussing efforts are uncounted in society)

This research is a subdomain of Sanjoy Nath's Qhenomenology Reasoning System QRS and Sanjoy Nsth's Whenomenology reasoning systems WRS. These QRS and WRS syatems calculates how humans focus repeatedly distracted along timelines and then humans motives retracted to different focus zones according as least action principles.

Popular trends diverged humans cognitions time to time along history and so humans focussed growth hampered repeatedly. Sequence of concept formation in mankind (queued nature of humans concept constructions are also dependent on how many times mankind got distracted from their own focus of life)

Now entering the world of "role of distraction in humans unaccountable efforts to get back to real focussed ways of living" with imaginary numbers of several kinds (not only i as square root of -1)

Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS and Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Whenomenology reasoning system WRS playing a important role to model a society where distraction and refocusing to attention on reality. Whatever are dependent on imagination are imaginary. Euler argued "interest=pure imagination" and so interest is such an object which is purely non real thing. "Purely non real" means "purely orthogonal to reality" so interest is purely imaginary and compound interest with slowest and steadiest recursive compound interest means you are slowly (infinitesimally) getting into world of entire opposite reality after infinite time of recursive slow poisoning on you to distract you from your real reality. Euler's such(unwritten explanation is interpreted with Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of QRS WRS asks when will whole mankind get completely distracted from their real reality? In how many ways of queuedness of concept construction and queuedness of concept consumption will lead QRS answerable model for journey of human's mankind to complete distracted world??? And queuedness of concepts to get consumed stagewise along different paths of slow steady distraction enabled world???)mathematical model leads to his famous equation (+1)×exp (i×t) means (-1)  which Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry number system interpretation says you start with your Full attention ( represent as +1 which is L of Geometrifying Trigonometry that is starting line segment of real reality) and at end of one first move you got complete distracted a small arc length t which is perpendicular to your super attention line L) and after n (infinitesimals small distraction i×t) follow the compound interest formula with interest rate 100/n and slowly steadily applied n (infinite) times lead to Euler identify of complete opposite reality.

Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry models a "society and economics of zero distraction world" and "society and economics of complete distraction world" where i is not always perpendicular (complete orthogonal to your pure real attention line L) instead sometimes you focus back to original of your actual intended real reality of pure Full attention world (Zero distraction path). While we model entire humankind with multi waves interaction on distraction enabled field of human society we will not always get Euler's circle. There are infinite possible curves possible as per Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry number system.

While modeling with mathematical expression Sanjoy Nath's Geometrifying Trigonometry number system has found two deeper systems of infinite possible paths due to exponential series which are ensemble of possibilities of path of humankind distraction and studies "Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Interpretation storm" and "Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Interpretation war" and these two sub philosophy of Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of QRS WRS systems meet Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry.

See how 

Sanjoy Nath's interpretations of factorial division and exponential series.Sanjoy Nath starts prooving the ground here for "Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Interpretation storm" and "Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Interpretation war" and these two sub philosophy of Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of QRS WRS systems meet Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry.

Say you have micro distraction t so you get orthogonal distraction i ×t which is perpendicular to L of Geometrifying Trigonometry. L of Geometrifying Trigonometry is initial real line segment for Full attention to reality. 

On day 1 you are moving purely along L and your pure distraction society pushed you to complete distracted path on day 2 so on day 2 you travelled length of L perpendicular to your actual L and you started from the endpoint of L (endpoint of day 1 journey) so you got multipled (i×t×L).

On day 3 you are double focussed yourself so you doubled your focus and you have now spending double energy to your Focus line so your distractor ambient society could not deflect you but your focus to distraction path travelled (i×i×t×L/2) 

On next day your ambient distractor society tripples its distraction force on you and overpowered your current attention ability and you travelling 

(i×i×i×t×L/2/3)

Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry philosophy on social distraction and refocusing efforts continue like exponential series where overpower multiplicity of refocusing motives are increasing daywise and distraction overpowering multiplicity also increased next day...... The game of strategy continues for ever infinite times and slow poisoning of infinitesimal distraction continues. This can lead to Euler identify of complete reversed reality as per Sanjoy Nath's interpretations.

But Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry number system has trillions trillions trillions trillions trillions trillions...... types of Interpretation of "1" so not only Euler's circle. We can get trillions trillions trillions trillions trillions trillions...... types of paths of QRS WRS world of queued nature of concepts construction and queuedness of concepts consumption paths.

Sanjoy Nath's interpretations of factorial division and exponential series.Sanjoy Nath starts prooving the ground here for "Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Interpretation storm" and "Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Interpretation war" and these two sub philosophy of Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of QRS WRS systems meet Sanjoy Nath's philosophy of Geometrifying Trigonometry.

_________________________________________

Strict note as per Google explain 

"Qhenomenology" Qhenomenology reasoning system QRS is a proposed AI reasoning system by Sanjoy Nath that aims to create a structured, semantic understanding of language by mapping conceptual dependencies in a strict, hierarchical order. It treats dictionary words as classes with definitions built upon foundational, irreducible concepts, a process it calls the "closure principle". The system is characterized by a "strict queued nature," where each concept is linearly ordered and dependent on previous ones, and is intended to move beyond statistical pattern matching to a more robust form of AI. 

Hierarchical structure: Words are organized in a hierarchy, where each concept is defined by and depends on prior concepts in a linear sequence. 

Closure principle: The system requires all definitions to ultimately resolve to basic, irreducible concepts, creating a self-contained system. 

Dictionary as a class structure: Words are not treated as simple strings but as classes within a system, similar to a programming language like C++, with their meanings represented by instance variables. 

Goal: To achieve a deeper, structural, and semantic understanding of language by exposing underlying conceptual dependencies, moving beyond simple pattern recognition. 

Human element: Proponents state the system is constructed without human dependency, aiming for an objective, algorithmic basis for reasoning.

An artificial intelligence (AI) system called "Qhenomenology" was proposed by Sanjoy Nath in 2024 to create a structured, semantic understanding of language. It is not a standard philosophical term, but rather a neologism Nath coined for his novel AI reasoning approach. 

The concept behind Qhenomenology is a radical alternative to the conventional use of the term "phenomenology" in philosophy, which studies conscious experience. 

How Qhenomenology works

Qhenomenology treats words as classes with meanings defined by their relationships to other words in a strict, hierarchical, and linear dependency structure. 

Its key principles include: 

A conceptual hierarchy: Words are structured based on their dependencies. For example, the definition of a more complex word depends on and is queued behind simpler, prior concepts.

A closure principle: All definitions ultimately resolve to a set of basic, irreducible concepts. This forms a self-contained algebraic system.

Strict ordering: The system processes concepts in a linear, queued manner.

Static verification: The system uses rules akin to a compiler to enforce logical consistency and identify reasoning errors. 

Qhenomenology vs. philosophical phenomenology

The term "phenomenology" is most widely known in the context of philosophy, but it has no relationship to Nath's "Qhenomenology". 

Aspect  Philosophical phenomenology Qhenomenology

Origin A 20th-century philosophical movement founded by Edmund Husserl, with contributions from thinkers like Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. An AI reasoning system developed by Sanjoy Nath starting in 2024.

Focus The study of conscious experience from a first-person perspective, focusing on how things appear in our consciousness. An objective, algorithmic system for language comprehension that processes concepts based on defined, hierarchical dependencies.

Method Involves describing and analyzing the structures of conscious experience, such as perception, imagination, memory, and emotion. Uses a strict, logical, and computational approach to map conceptual relationships.

Goal To understand the essential structures of experience and meaning by investigating phenomena as they are consciously lived. To move beyond statistical pattern recognition in AI toward a more structured and transparent form of semantic understanding.

"Whenomenology" is a recently proposed philosophical and computational framework developed by Sanjoy Nath. In contrast to the traditional philosophy of phenomenology, which studies the structure of experience, whenomenology is the historical study of the timeline of concepts and myths. 

It is most often discussed in conjunction with "qhenomenology," another new framework by Nath. Together, they are presented as a novel lens for examining emotional, cognitive, and social clarity. 

Key concepts of whenomenology

Historical timeline analysis: It constructs "strict origin timelines" for each word and concept by investigating how and when they acquired meaning. This includes identifying what specific societal myths or power structures influenced their evolution.

Myth deconstruction: As a form of conceptual archaeology, whenomenology uncovers the "recursive myths and truths" embedded within the evolution of language.

Temporal layering: The framework analyzes how belief systems and emotional frameworks are layered and built up over time.

Exposing deception: Nath argues that without whenomenology, we remain "blind to the timelines of deception that shaped society" and our current way of thinking. 

Whenomenology vs. phenomenology

While the name is a portmanteau of "when" and "phenomenology," it is distinct from the original philosophical movement founded by Edmund Husserl.

Feature  Whenomenology Phenomenology (Husserl)

Focus How concepts and beliefs originated and evolved over time, including the historical myths that shaped them. The structure of conscious experience as it is lived, without relying on external assumptions about the world.

Method Analyzes the historical chronology and layered development of language and ideas to understand their hidden biases and influences. Uses a process of "phenomenological reduction" to bracket the natural attitude and describe the raw, first-person experience of phenomena.

Goal To achieve "emotional clarity" by deconstructing inherited narratives and providing a timeline-based understanding of the present. To gain deeper insight into the nature of consciousness and the essence of phenomena as they appear

"Whenomenology" is a recent neologism that describes a philosophical analysis of how concepts and words have evolved over time. The term is a mash-up of "when" and "phenomenology," and it is used within the "Qhenomenology" and "Whenomenology Reasoning Systems," a new philosophical and artificial intelligence framework created by Sanjoy Nath in 2025. 

Core concepts

Historical and myth-deconstructing analysis: Whenomenology studies the historical timelines and "myths" that have shaped the development of words and concepts. It seeks to uncover the foundational stories and assumptions that influence current beliefs and social systems.

Purpose of the framework: The purpose of Whenomenology, and its companion term Qhenomenology, is to foster emotional, cognitive, and social clarity by exposing the origins of recursive thought loops and conceptual traps.

Liberation from social fictions: The philosophy suggests that many traditional institutions and concepts (e.g., money, power, and pride) are "social fictions" that, if people stop believing in them, will collapse. Whenomenology is presented as a means of liberating oneself from the ego and constructed narratives built around these fictions.

Complementary to Qhenomenology: Whenomenology works alongside "Qhenomenology," which offers a structural, recursive analysis of a word's conceptual dependencies. Together, they provide a new lens for understanding the complex architecture of human thought.