template for sanjoy nath's qhenomenology reasoning ইউজেস
Criticize harshly এবং মিসিং সংজ্ঞা গুলোর সংজ্ঞা কি হলে এই point of view কে fit করতে পারে তার ও লিস্ট করো।clain of definitions এর sequence queuedness flowchart ও তৈরি করে দাও
Qhenomenology reasoning system used to analyse these point of view
Point_of_view
{
"
"
}
Now rules of qhenomenology reasoning system
{
Axiom 1
Probability is backdated measure in sociology.Sanjoy Nath's qhenomenology reasoning system starts with assumption that all vocabulary words are just meaningless cpp classnames and the ordering of these vocabulary words dependent upon compilability ordering.this means while writing the dictionary you cannot use any word in right side (description side column 2) until all these words in description are well defined previously before that word is definitely defined before (in any previous row of same dictionary) . right side description is constructor of CPP class where left side column contains class names.This implies say any word at row r column 1 is described in row r column 2 and all word tokens (words used in column 2 are ensuried to present in any row<r column 1 of that same dictionary.untill column 1 row<r of dictionary contains a word w_i where I<r we cannot use w_i in right side column 2 in r th row. This strict condition is unique reasoning basis in Sanjoy Nath 's qhenomenology reasoning system.Ordering of basis objects and dependent objects are constructed following CPP compilability ordering.all vocabulary words are just unique Class names and are all uniquely QUEUED in column 1 of dictionary and exhaustive such queuedness describe the reasoning system of whole society. Regular use vocabulary, regular used queuedness of such concepts as CPP class descrbes the individual and society.This way CPP strictly ordered definition of classes compilability prooves meaningfulness. If the ordering alters, CPP project turns to non compilable.non compilability implies fallacy.noncompilability imples meaninglessness.strict QUEUED ness of vocabulary words (as concepts) are followed such that whole CPP project (dictionary or story or tender documents or legal documents are compilability check able)
Axiom 2
Sanjoy Nath 's Qhenomenology reasoning system takes awareness_ratio,attentiveness_ratio and sentitivity ratio as the alrernative measures which are more powerful predictability metric than probability
Take all population data (population of agents in a society) indexed and stored in rows of column 1 of a spreadsheet and all dictionary words (as qhenomenologically ordered queued in n rows of dictionary database column number 1 ) are now transposed and copied to analysis spreadsheet and pasted to row 1 n columns following ordering rules of axiom 1 (the axiom 1 rows of column 1 is now transposed to row 1 ,n columns for qhenomenology reasoning analysis spreadsheet.
Now we check how many individuals in society are aware about which concepts (listed in row 1 ,n columns of qhenomenology reasoning analysis spreadsheet).same style is used for design of weightage calculation metrics for awareness,attentiveness, sensitivity like measurement over society and these distribution are used to predict society structure.
Axiom 3
All assumption or tautology are ignored and strict definitely defined words, concepts are used following axiom 1.all documents,all stories,all essays,all poems...are ordered following axiom 1 first.
}
Criticize harshly for any kinds of point of view or for any kind of design documents , for any kind of tender documents , find the missing definitions , find the circular definitions , find the definition clashes as per the conditions in the axioms
ReplyDeleteQhenomenology reasoning system used to analyse these point of view
Point_of_view
{
"
//content to verify starts here
Copy paste your design document text here . Legal document text here , tender document text here … whatever your point of views are and the LLM systems can do the axiomatic testing as per the conditions
//content to verify completes here
"
}
Now rules of qhenomenology reasoning system
{
Axiom 1
Probability is backdated measure in sociology.Sanjoy Nath's qhenomenology reasoning system starts with assumption that all vocabulary words are just meaningless cpp classnames and the ordering of these vocabulary words dependent upon compilability ordering.this means while writing the dictionary you cannot use any word in right side (description side column 2) until all these words in description are well defined previously before that word is definitely defined before (in any previous row of same dictionary) . right side description is constructor of CPP class where left side column contains class names.This implies say any word at row r column 1 is described in row r column 2 and all word tokens (words used in column 2 are ensuried to present in any row<r column 1 of that same dictionary.untill column 1 row<r of dictionary contains a word w_i where I<r we cannot use w_i in right side column 2 in r th row. This strict condition is unique reasoning basis in Sanjoy Nath 's qhenomenology reasoning system.Ordering of basis objects and dependent objects are constructed following CPP compilability ordering.all vocabulary words are just unique Class names and are all uniquely QUEUED in column 1 of dictionary and exhaustive such queuedness describe the reasoning system of whole society. Regular use vocabulary, regular used queuedness of such concepts as CPP class descrbes the individual and society.This way CPP strictly ordered definition of classes compilability prooves meaningfulness. If the ordering alters, CPP project turns to non compilable.non compilability implies fallacy.noncompilability imples meaninglessness.strict QUEUED ness of vocabulary words (as concepts) are followed such that whole CPP project (dictionary or story or tender documents or legal documents are compilability check able)
Axiom 2
Sanjoy Nath 's Qhenomenology reasoning system takes awareness_ratio,attentiveness_ratio and sentitivity ratio as the alrernative measures which are more powerful predictability metric than probability
Take all population data (population of agents in a society) indexed and stored in rows of column 1 of a spreadsheet and all dictionary words (as qhenomenologically ordered queued in n rows of dictionary database column number 1 ) are now transposed and copied to analysis spreadsheet and pasted to row 1 n columns following ordering rules of axiom 1 (the axiom 1 rows of column 1 is now transposed to row 1 ,n columns for qhenomenology reasoning analysis spreadsheet.
Now we check how many individuals in society are aware about which concepts (listed in row 1 ,n columns of qhenomenology reasoning analysis spreadsheet).same style is used for design of weightage calculation metrics for awareness,attentiveness, sensitivity like measurement over society and these distribution are used to predict society structure.
Axiom 3
All assumption or tautology are ignored and strict definitely defined words, concepts are used following axiom 1.all documents,all stories,all essays,all poems...are ordered following axiom 1 first.(If any supplied database for Qhenomenologically ordered dictionary terms or lookup table are not supplied then all the definitions are to supply in the text , all the tautology are necessary to supply in the text here in the content
}